Discussing the risk perception of MNCs into the Middle East

Discussing the risk perception of MNCs into the Middle East

Blog Article

Find out more exactly how Western multinational corporations perceive and handle dangers within the Middle East.

A lot of the present literature on risk management strategies for multinational corporations features particular uncertainties but omits uncertainties that are tough to quantify. Indeed, lots of research in the worldwide management field has focused on the handling of either political risk or foreign exchange uncertainties. Finance and insurance coverage literature emphasises the danger factors which is why hedging or insurance instruments are developed to mitigate or transfer a company's risk visibility. However, current research reports have brought some fresh and interesting insights. They have sought to fill the main research gaps by giving empirical knowledge about the risk perception of Western multinational corporations and their management techniques on the firm level within the Middle East. In one research after gathering and analysing data from 49 major worldwide businesses that are have extensive operations in the GCC countries, the authors found the following. Firstly, the risk related to foreign investments is clearly a great deal more multifaceted compared to often cited variables of political risk and exchange rate visibility. Cultural danger is regarded as more essential than political risk, economic danger, and financial danger. Secondly, despite the fact that aspects of Arab culture are reported to really have a strong influence on the business environment, most firms find it difficult to adapt to regional routines and traditions.

In spite of the political instability and unfavourable fiscal conditions in certain parts of the Middle East, foreign direct investment (FDI) in the area and, specially, within the Arabian Gulf has been steadily increasing in the last 20 years. The relevance of the Middle East and Gulf areas is growing for FDI, and the associated risk appears to be crucial. Yet, research regarding the risk perception of multinationals in the region is limited in amount and quality, as consultants and attorneys like Louise Flanagan in Ras Al Khaimah would probably attest. Although various empirical studies have investigated the effect of risk on FDI, many analyses have largely been on political risk. Nonetheless, a new focus has appeared in present research, shining a limelight on an often-disregarded aspect particularly cultural factors. In these pioneering studies, the writers noticed that businesses and their management frequently really underestimate the impact of cultural factors because of a lack of knowledge regarding cultural variables. In reality, some empirical research reports have unearthed that cultural differences lower the performance of multinational enterprises.

This cultural dimension of risk management calls for a shift in how MNCs run. Conforming to regional customs is not just about being familiar with business etiquette; it also requires much deeper social integration, such as appreciating local values, decision-making styles, and the societal norms that impact company practices and worker conduct. In GCC countries, successful business relationships are built on trust and individual connections rather than just being transactional. Additionally, MNEs can benefit from adapting their human resource administration to mirror the social profiles of regional employees, as factors influencing employee motivation and job satisfaction vary widely across cultures. This involves a shift in mindset and strategy from developing robust economic risk management tools to investing in social intelligence and local expertise as consultants and attorneys such Salem Al Kait and Ammar Haykal in Ras Al Khaimah may likely suggest.